Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Formulation and Evaluation of Buccal Mucoadhesive Bilayered Tablets of Enalapril Maleate

Pranav Shah, Yogita Gadhethariya, Shailesh Shah

Abstract


The buccal mucoadhesive bilayered tablets of Enalapril Maleate were fabricated with objective of avoiding first pass metabolism and prolonging the duration of action. The tablets were prepared by wet granulation wherein, one layer comprised of drug and bio adhesive polymer, whereas second layer consisted of drug free backing layer of ethyl cellulose. Bioadhesive polymers like Carbopol 934P and one either of three HPMC K4M/ HPMC K15M/ HPMC K100M were employed in combination. A backing layer of ethyl cellulose was provided to ensure unidirectional drug release. FTIR and DSC studies indicated absences of drug-excipient incompatibilities. The tablets were evaluated for physical parameters, surface pH, swelling index, assay, bio adhesion strength, ex vivo permeation studies and in vitro release studies. All the batches showed good bio adhesive force in the range of 0.168 to 0.334 N. A direct correlation was found between the concentration of the bio adhesive polymer and the mucoadhesive strength, where as an inverse correlation was found between concentration of polymer and drug release. In order to determine the mode of release, the data was subjected to zero order, first order, Higuchi and Peppas diffusion models. The formulations F4 (containing 30 mg each of HPMC K4M and Carbopol 934P) exhibited in vitro drug release of 101.0% upto 12 h along with satisfactory bio adhesive force 0.31N. Accelerated stability studies (40±20C/75±5% RH for 3 months) of the optimized formulation (F4) showed absence of any significant changes in hardness, drug content, surface pH, bio adhesive force and in-vitro drug release studies as compared to initial values.

Keywords


Mucoadhesive bilayer tablet, Enalapril Maleate, Carbopol 934P, HPMC, Bioadhesive strength

Full Text:

PDF

References


Shojaei A. H. Buccal mucosa as a route for systemic drug delivery: a review. Journal of pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Science. 1998; 1(1):15–30p.

Lachman L, Lieberman HA, Kanig JL. The theory and practice of industrial pharmacy. 3rd ed. Bombay: Varghese Publishing House; 1991; 293–345p.

Vidyasagar N, Mallikarjuna K Rao et al. A review on buccal drug delivery system. Journal of Pharmaceutical Research and Development. 2012; 1(2):29–35p.

Haris D, Robinson JR. Buccal drug delivery via the mucous membrane of oral cavity. Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.1992; 81(1):1–9p.

Muthadi Radhika,Vamshi Raj. Formulation and in vitro evaluation of buccoadehesive bilayer tablets of Enalapril maleate. International Journal of Innovative Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research. 2013; 1(1): 96–108p.

Shantha Kumar G.S, Narayan acharyulu R. Design and Evaluation of Mucoadhesive Compacts of Selective Antihypertensive Agents. International Journal of Drug Development & Research. 2012; 4(3): 208–219p.

Chinna Reddy P, Chaitanya K.S.C., Madhusudan Rao Y. A review on bio adhesive buccal drug delivery systems: current status of formulation and evaluation methods .DARU Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2011; (19):385–404p.

Sweetman SC. Martindale - The complete drug reference. 33rd Ed. Pharmaceutical Press: London; 2002.

http://www.drugs.com/Enalapril maleate.html

www.drugbank.com

Indian Pharmacopoeia 7th Edn, Vol. 2, Govt. of India. Controller of Publications, New Delhi; 2010.

Prasanna RI, Anitha P, Chetty CM. Formulation and Evaluation of Bucco-Adhesive Tablets of Sumatriptan Succinate. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Investigation. 2011; 1(3):182–191p.

Pravin Gavali, Atul Gaikwad, Radhika PR, Sivakumar T. Design and development of hydroxypropyl Methylcellulose (HPMC)based polymeric film of Enalapril maleate. International Journal of Pharm Tech Research. 2010; 2(1): 274–82p.

Gupta A, Garg S, Khar RK. Mucoadheshive buccal drug delivery system- A review. Indian Drugs.1992; 29(3):586–593p.

Yong C S, Jung J, Rhee J, Kim C, Choi H. Physicochemical characterization and evaluation of buccal adhesive tablets containing omeprazole. Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy, 2001; 27(5): 447–55p.

Prudat-Christiaens C, Arnaud P, Allain P, Chaumeil JC. Aminophylline bio adhesive tablets attempted by wet granulation. International Journal of Pharmceuticals. 1996; 141: 109–16p.

Lopez C R, Porteo A, Vila-Jato J L, Alonso M J. Design and evaluation of chitosan/ethyl cellulose muccoadhesive bilayered devices for buccal drug delivery. Journal of Controlled Release. 1998; 55: 143–52p.

Korsmeyer RW, Peppas NA, Gurney R, Deckar B, Buri P. Mechanism of solute release from porous hydrophilic polymers. International Journal of Pharmaceutics.1983; 15: 25–35p.

Paulo Costa, Lobo JMS. Modelling and comparison of dissolution profiles. European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2001; 13: 123–133p.

Mudgulkar A, Kadam S, Pokharkar V. Development of buccal adhesive tablet with prolonged antifungal activity: optimization and ex vivo deposition studies. Indian Journal of pharmaceutical sciences. 2009; 71(3):290–94p.

Mohammed F A, Khedr H. Preparation and in vitro/in vivo evaluation of the buccal bio adhesive properties of slow-release tablets containing miconazole nitrate. Drug development and industrial pharmacy. 2003; 29(3): 321–7p.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.37591/tdd.v1i1.1347

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Trends in Drug Delivery